Try General-President (I)

For quite some time I besets the firm idea of prosecuting the Cuban president and recently I started it. I choose freedom this space to share with you this experience.

When analyzing the reasons that would argue as the basis of demand, I took into consideration the fact that those who claim bears the burden of evidence, procedural situation that would put me at a great disadvantage if the reason for the criminal, because as I have shown on other occasions, it is precisely my defendant, the president, who ultimately holds the monopoly and control of legal evidence.

It was for this reason that I chose to establish demand for the concept of "Violation of Constitutional Precepts". First, because the damning evidence that would be available would be sufficient and irrefutable, to emanate and verified the same in the events of the life of Cubans own, each citizen a living example of them, and secondly, because because Constitution is the highest expression of the sovereignty of the people or what is the same, the direct expression of his will, so the president who violates it , it loses its legitimacy, and therefore must be replaced.

I then found the task of selecting the constitutional provisions which I believe have been violated by my defendant, namely:

Article 1 in stating that the Cuban government is organized with all and for the good of all, for the enjoyment of political freedom, social justice, individual and collective welfare and human solidarity.

Article 9 , which provides that the State must guarantee the freedom and full dignity of man as well as a job with which to contribute to meeting their own needs.

Article 26, as the law is devoted to each person who suffers damages by officials or agents of the State for the performance of the duties inherent in their offices, to obtain the corresponding indemnification as prescribed by law.

Article 41 stipulates that as all citizens enjoy equal rights.

Article 47, as forces the Cuban government to ensure through social security system adequate protection to all workers prevented from working.

Article 56, as establishes the right of inviolability of the home,

Article 58 , which provides that freedom and inviolability of the person are guaranteed to everyone residing in the country, and no one can be arrested except in cases in the manner and with the guarantees prescribed by law.

Article 60 stipulates that as confiscation of property as punishment applies only by the authorities, in cases and procedures determined by law.

Well gentlemen, once certain incriminating reasons that would argue in the application, would determine the evidence to be proposed, which is not a difficult task, I assure you that I have evidence and enough witnesses to perplex the court justice more incredulous.

Only heroic Ladies in White would bring me more than enough of violations of each of these precepts tests. Sumase these, which would provide thousands of independent journalists, human rights activists and members of civil lawyers and political organizations, which have mostly been the victims of all these precepts. And finally, the great unquestionable proof, the millions of Cuban workers earning a paltry and unworthy salary, which forces them to commit a crime for survival.

So far, I hope not doubt that left him suffering there reasons to finally rid ourselves on the path of justice of the Cuban dictator, but ... how to proceed according to the procedure laid down?

(To be continue).

nelsonchartrand@gmail.com